Your Roster verifies government and defense expertise through relationships, credentials, and experience. We deliver standing expert cells or scored datasets to the labs training models for government use.
Procurement judgment, policy tradeoffs, cleared-program decisions — the reasoning that makes government work defensible lives in the people who did it, not in a public dataset. A model trained without it can sound right and still be wrong in exactly the way that matters.
Every competitor in this category verifies a credential or a test score. None can say that a named person who worked alongside the expert vouches for the judgment you’re buying. That gap is what Your Roster was built to close.
Your Roster grew out of a professional network of government, defense and public-sector operators who already consent to being found and vouched for.
That relationship graph is the verification layer — live today, not a roadmap item.
What we’re building on top of it is the part a lab buys: standing expert cells and scored datasets, sourced from that verified pool and delivered against your rubric.
One verified pool, sold either as the people or as the work they produce. A dataset is the faster way in — it’s the quickest test of whether this is the expertise you actually need.
A standing team, assembled to your rubric
Five to twenty professionals assembled for your domain and delivered as one unit for the length of an engagement — evaluation, RLHF, SFT, rubric and benchmark work in regulated domains.
Scored answers, bought outright
A batch of expert answers in one domain, written by verified operators and scored against a published rubric before delivery. Non-exclusive licence, no engagement to staff.
That’s the difference between judgment a model merely imitates and judgment it can be held to. It’s why the teaching has to start from provenance, not just accuracy.
The rest of the categoryAn AI-interview score
Your RosterNamed former colleagues who opt in to vouch for work they saw
The rest of the categorySelf-reported credentials
Your RosterEmployment and credentials checked, each labeled by verification level
The rest of the categoryA reputation score after delivery
Your RosterA provenance report you can inspect before the engagement starts
The rest of the categoryMillions of unverified profiles
Your RosterA small, trusted pool in the domains where judgment is the product
Evaluation criteria drafted by people who did the work in government, defense, healthcare policy, legal or compliance — so "correct" means what it means in practice, not what it means on the open web.
Every cell member is screened for conflicts against your engagement, with employment and clearance status checked rather than self-reported.
For each member: verified employment, credentials labeled by how they were verified, and the named colleagues who vouched. Yours to check, before and after delivery.
No classified or controlled unclassified information in any answer. Anonymized by default. Raw uploads never retained — only the fields verification actually needs.
Evaluation, RLHF and SFT, rubric and benchmark work in regulated domains — delivered by a standing cell or as a scored dataset, with provenance attached.
Cleared and former-federal expertise for programs where an identity credential alone doesn’t establish judgment quality.
One-to-five-hour expert calls with relationship-verified government and regulatory operators, for the decisions that need a real track record behind them.
Tell us the domain, the kind of work and the rough scale. Design partners help shape the rubric and the makeup of their cell while both are still open.